Higgs CP at Les Houches 2019

Imagine sitting amidst the stunning backdrop of the Alps, where the world's brightest minds in particle physics convene. That's exactly what happened at the Les Houches 2019 workshop. I will be diving, in this post, into one of the topics discussed there: the Higgs boson's CP properties and a proposal to extend the definition of the Simplified Template Cross Section framework to include CP sensitive bins.

January 17, 2020

Picture this: the majestic Alps, a setting not just for breathtaking views but also for breathtaking science. The Les Houches 2019 workshop brought together brilliant minds to probe deeper into the Higgs boson's secrets. At the heart of this study lies a fundamental question: What are the charge (C) and the parity (P) symmetries of the Higgs boson?

Image 1
The Alps view from Les Houhces

In the Standard Model of particle physics, the Higgs boson is like the VIP at the party -- it's crucial but somewhat mysterious. Its interactions are believed to preserve CP symmetries. But what if there's more to this story? In the Standard Model (SM) of particles physics, the Higgs boson interactions preserve the CP symmetries. Any deviation from the expected CP symmetries could hint at physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM). That's what makes this study so riveting!

CP violation and VBF

The Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) production process at the LHC (Large Hadron Collider). It's the second most common way Higgs bosons are produced, and it has a unique fingerprint: two forward tagging jets. These jets form like a lighthouse whose beams pointing into opposite directions in the detector leading us to a cleaner signal sample and better background rejection.

Now, let's talk physics. The interaction of the Higgs boson with two spin-one gauge bosons is where the action is. The tensor structure of this HVV vertex is sensitive to the CP properties of the Higgs boson. The most general tensor structure describing the interaction of the Higgs boson with two spin-one gauge boson which contributes to the VBF production mode can be written as

Tμν(q1,q2)=a1(q1,q2) gμν+a2(q1,q2) [q1q2gμνq1μq2ν]+a3(q1,q2) ϵμναβq1,αq2,β\begin{aligned} T^{\mu\nu} (q_1,q_2) &=a_1(q_1,q_2) ~g^{\mu\nu} \\ &+ a_2(q_1,q_2)~[q_1\cdot q_2 g^{\mu\nu} - q_1^{\mu}q_2^{\nu}]\\ &+ a_3(q_1,q_2)~\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} q_{1,\alpha}q_{2,\beta} \end{aligned}

where q1q_1 and q2q_2 are the four-momenta of the two fusing gauge bosons VV. The scalar a1a_1 represents the SM contribution to the coupling, while the form factors a2a_{2} and a3a_3 represent CP-even and CP-odd amplitudes respectively. An anomaly in couplings can manifest itself as a deviation of these parameters from their SM values (which are a1=1a_1=1 and a2,a3=0a_2, a_3=0).

One of the coolest tools in this study is the azimuthal angle between the two tagging jets (Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj}). It's not just a number; it's a key to differentiating between the form factors. But, there's a catch! If CP-even and CP-odd couplings of similar strength are present, their effects might cancel each other out (see Ref. [1] [2]). To tackle this, the study introduces a clever twist in defining Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj} to highlight the interference effects. It's like adding vinegar to french fries, it makes all the difference!

If b+b_{+} and bb_{-} are the four-momenta of the two proton-beams and p+p_{+} and pp_{-} the four momenta of the two tagging jets from VBF, then

ϵμνρσb+μp+νbρbσ=2pT,+pT,sin(ϕ+ϕ)=2pT,+pT,sin(Δϕjj)\begin{aligned} \epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}b_{+}^\mu p_{+}^\nu b_{-}^\rho b_{-}^\sigma &= 2p_{T,+}p_{T,-}\sin(\phi_{+} - \phi_{-})\\ &= 2p_{T,+}p_{T,-}\sin(\Delta\phi_{jj}) \end{aligned}

p+ (ϕ+)p_{+}~(\phi_{+}) and p (ϕ+)p_{-}~(\phi_{+}) denotes the four-momenta (azimuthal angles) of the two tagging jets, where p+p_{+} (pp_{-}) points to the same detector hemisphere as b+b_{+} (bb_{-}). Such ordering removes ambiguity in the standard definition of Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj}. The ratio of the form factors can directly be measured by determining the minimum of the Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj} distribution. The typical distribution of purely CP-odd, CP-event and SM couplings are shown in the following figure,

Image 1
Figure 1: Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj} observable for pure CP-odd, CP-even and SM-like couplings.

Redefining STXS Bins

The Simplified Template Cross Sections (STXS) framework [3], evolving from signal strength measurements in Run1, has been adopted in various ATLAS and CMS analyses with a limited bin number. With increasing LHC data, the necessity to examine narrow kinematic areas for beyond the Standard Model (BSM) deviations becomes evident. This research suggests enhancing Stage 1.1 binning [4] through the signed Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj} observable, aiming to detect the Higgs boson's elusive CP characteristics.

Higgs boson simulations, involving anomalous HVV couplings, are generated under both scalar and pseudo-scalar assumptions using JHUGEN [5] [6] [7]. To accurately depict final state particle recoil due to QCD radiation, JHUGEN [8] is integrated with Pythia. The Higgs boson remains undecayed in these simulations, with its mass fixed at M_H=125 GeV.

The STXS approach for Stage 1.1, as delineated, categorises the VBF topology starting from an invariant mass threshold of Mjj>350GeVM_{jj}>350 GeV. Subsequently, it divides events based on the Higgs boson's transverse momentum, followed by further segmentation based on MjjM_{jj} and pTHjjp_{T}^{Hjj}, focusing on distinguishing exclusive 2-jets and inclusive 3-jets categories.

For non-SM contribution assessment, the signal distribution psigp_{sig} for a specific observable x is modelled as a synthesis of components from SM-like and anomalous amplitudes, including their interference effects [5] [9]

psig(x)=(1fmix) pa1(x)+fmix pan(x)+fmix(1fmix) pa1,anintp_{\rm sig}(x) = (1-f_{\rm mix}) ~p_{\rm a_1}(x) + f_{\rm mix}~p_{\rm a_n}(x) + \sqrt{f_{\rm mix}(1-f_{\rm mix})} ~p^{\rm int}_{\rm a_1, a_n}

where panp_{\rm a_n} is template histogram or probability of pure an\rm a_n term, and pa1,anintp^{\rm int}_{\rm a_1, a_n} describes the interference between the two terms. Three values of the anomalous coupling are introduced 0.1%, 1% and 10%.

We would like to look at signed Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj} in different bins of the STXS stage 1.1 bins definition. For this study, we decided to merge the MjjM_{jj} bins above 350 GeV350~\rm GeV, as the CP-phase has low dependency on the MjjM_{jj} as well as for pTHjjp_{T}^{Hjj}. The pTHp_{T}^{H} split at 200 GeV200~\rm GeV is however kept as it was proven to be sensitive to BSM [4]. The corresponding azimuthal angle distributions are shown below,

Description of first image
(a)
Description of second image
(b)
Description of first image
(c)
Description of second image
(d)

Figure 2: Normalised distributions of the jet-jet azimuthal angle difference as defined in for various mixed CP scenarios between SM and CP-even (a, b) and CP-odd (c, d) couplings. Colours represents different mixing strength values fmix=0.1%,1%,10%f_{\rm mix}=0.1\%, 1\%, 10\%.

In exploring the nuances of CP violation in the Higgs sector, we delve into the intriguing patterns emerging in the Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj} distributions. For CP-even coupling, the interference term mirrors the phase of the Standard Model (SM) distribution, as clearly illustrated in Figure. 2:a and Figure. 2:b.. Intriguingly, the most notable deviations from the expected distribution are observed at both the extremities and the midpoint. This effect becomes more pronounced in the high transverse momentum (pTHp_{T}^{H}) region, particularly above 200 GeV. By segmenting the data into four distinct bins—ranging from π-\pi to π\pi with divisions at π/2-\pi/2 and π/2\pi/2—we can effectively capture any CP-even deviations from the SM predictions across both high and low pTHp_{T}^{H} scenarios.

Conversely, the CP-odd interference exhibits a fascinating shift in the Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj} phase towards negative values. Considering the inherent symmetry in the SM's Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj} distribution, any observed asymmetry could be attributed to a parity-odd coupling, specifically the a3a_3 term. This phenomenon is depicted in Figure. 2:c and Figure. 2:d. Here, we observe a phase change in the amplitude at Δϕjj=0\Delta\phi_{jj}=0, particularly in the low pTHp_{T}^{H} bin. To better capture these subtleties, a refined binning approach that includes a split at Δϕjj=0\Delta\phi_{jj}=0 is proposed. This would allow for a more precise measurement of asymmetries in the cross-section between positive and negative bins, potentially unveiling any CP-odd anomalies.

This methodology of defining CP-sensitive bins is not limited to one specific scenario. It can be equally applied to other production modes, notably in stage 1.1, including gluon-fusion and Higgsstrahlung processes. For the Higgsstrahlung process, similar patterns are observed in the HVV vertex. Here, Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj} can be particularly insightful for events where the Higgs is accompanied by two jets and the dijet mass (MjjM_{jj}) is less than 120 GeV. This approach opens up new avenues for investigating CP violation and its manifestations in various production modes, contributing significantly to our understanding of the Higgs sector.

Conclusion

So, what have we got here? we have presented an extension to the VBF STXS stage 1.1 to include CP-sensitive bins based on the signed Δϕjj\Delta\phi_{jj} observable. We have demonstrated that the usage for such observable is largely independent of the form factor and allows the probe of the HVV coupling. A binning of [π,π/2,0,π/2,π][-\pi,-\pi/2, 0, \pi/2, \pi] is proposed under MjjM_{jj} bins above 350 GeV350~\rm GeV in both high and low pTHp_{T}^{H} branches.

Image 1
Coding facing the Alps!

References

[1]
V. Hankele, G. Klamke, D. Zeppenfeld, T. Figy, Anomalous Higgs boson couplings in vector boson fusion at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 095001. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.095001.
[2]
G. Klamke, D. Zeppenfeld, Higgs plus two jet production via gluon fusion as a signal at the CERN LHC, JHEP 04 (2007) 052. DOI:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/04/052.
[3]
J.R. Andersen, others, Les Houches 2015: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report, in: 9th Les Houches Workshop on Physics at TeV Colliders, 2016.
[4]
N. Berger, others, Simplified Template Cross Sections - Stage 1.1, (2019).
[5]
I. Anderson, others, Constraining Anomalous HVV Interactions at Proton and Lepton Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 035007. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.035007.
[6]
S. Bolognesi, Y. Gao, A.V. Gritsan, K. Melnikov, M. Schulze, N.V. Tran, A. Whitbeck, On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095031. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.095031.
[7]
Y. Gao, A.V. Gritsan, Z. Guo, K. Melnikov, M. Schulze, N.V. Tran, Spin Determination of Single-Produced Resonances at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 075022. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.075022.
[8]
T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J.R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C.O. Rasmussen, P.Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159–177. DOI:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024.
[9]
V. Khachatryan, others, Constraints on the spin-parity and anomalous HVV couplings of the Higgs boson in proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 012004. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.012004.